chae s sone

FN:AG Andrew Cuomo 4 10. sent
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo
State of New York
Charities Bureau
Nathan Courtney
Office Assistant Attorney General
The Capitol Albany, NY
April 10, 2010

RE: Financial mismanagement
In Korean United Methodist Church and Institute
(Steven H. Park, Paul Choi, Young So Kim among offenders)

Attorney General's Orders
Three Parties
1. Attorney General's order to repay the embezzled $70,000 by Paul Choi.

2. Attorney General's order to restitute the abused church money from the abusers was not complied at all.

Implications of the Orders
And Role Conflicts

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attorney General's Orders

The case began when it called for your attention to the problems created by the church group who lost moral responsibilities in dealing with the church finances.

However, the results seem to indicate the embezzlers won in contrary to the justice as the investigation went along their ways.

Your office has processed the cases in 2003. At the end of the investigation, your office ordered the chairman of the Board, Hyun Joong Kim the restitution of the abused church money, according to information from you. But the restitution had never been initiated because of the church leaders' negligence and the Attorney General's non-interference. The status of repayment of Paul Choi’s embezzlements seems to be unclear.

Consequently all the abusers seem to be gone free with the moneybags without clearing the problems in the money scandals, cheating the church, the congregation, and scapegoating and demonizing the innocent parties which are really losers in contrary to the principles.

Now the Spitzer era has gone, it should be looked into as in a Cuomo era.

We hope that the Attorney General Andrew Cuomo would have a chance to re-evaluate the status for the better resolutions in due diligence than it was done during the Spitzer era.

Please reconsider to enforce the initial orders to restitute the abused funds for the good causes by tracing the issues and the processes that previously applied for the investigation.

I wish your office to reconsider another investigation to do justice for the church victims and the concerned members.

Meantime, I wish to educate myself further on the critical matters to understand what is going on this chaotic relations of the church, state and secular society.

Your initial orders included the basic two categories of the abuses. It was to implement the state law to recover the stolen church money, but not to demand a moral conversion.

1. Attorney General's order to repay the embezzled $70,000 by Paul Choi.

2. Attorney General's order to restitute the abused church money from the abusers was not complied at all.

The order did not clearly define the responsible parties:

Three Parties

They should have been defined three parties:

1. The Hijackers – Offenders- who filed lawsuits against the scapegoats –defendants – Sone family members.

2. The church is an innocent victim under the offenders' destructive ploy. The church as legally and religiously defined – plaintiff – under their ploy by misleading or misled attorneys by the hijackers.

3. Sacrificial lambs – witnesses. Our family fell into their victim as the scapegoats for them to cover up their embezzlements - church hijacking.

The most imperative voices should have been able to come from the church, the Attorney General and the scapegoat - the sacrificial lambs as the witnesses. The offenders should have obeyed the orders but smartly deceived the authorities.

Of course, your orders were the paramount moral imperatives for them.

All offenders had nothing to do with the church affairs but the independent intentional initiations in the criminal actions.

Your action was needed solely for the protection of the integrity of the church as a legally established entity within the law.

Clearly the church should ask the hijackers and the embezzlers to restitute the stolen church money. The question is "Who is the responsible legal church."


Implications of the Orders
And Role Conflicts

The orders were pivotal process to resolve the disgraceful events in this hijacked church.

But there was no moral entity to manage the orders accordingly in the ill church leadership - True church.
If the responsible parties complied with the orders, the complex unpleasant problems could have been resolved in a high degree adequacy.

The victims of these people hoped positive results could come for the church by the responsible persons implementing the orders - the result was disappointing, as there was no clearly defined responsible party - Church.


Church Unable to be the Responsible Party

However, the orders failed to be implemented, as there were no definite responsible parties within the church as there was no "A real church" in the context of the faith in Christ and the church rule.

Meantime, the Attorney General did not interfere in the missing role of the church as the responsible party to recover the abused fund.

When the Attorney General ordered Mr. Hyun Joong Kim, chairman of the Board to recover the missing fund, there was no real church in this "Korean church." Thus, even if the chairman pretended truly representing her interests, his words were not truthful as he represented a church outside of the prerogative church zone.

In fact, a fake church under the embezzlers' leadership acted falsely as if a real church following the orders.

Thus, although the orders were issued in good intention, there was no a responsible party " truthful church" to implement the orders in support of the church's interests except the victims.

Chairman Kim’s excuse, to recover the abused fund could be costly and he did not act. The church has a liability insurance.

The writer wishes let your office would understand that your office fell into the situation in messy deceptive scenario that should be carefully analyzed and cleared the matters to do justice for the church accordingly in honor of your office in light of our civility.

Rev. Chul Woo Chang and so-called church officers
failed to define the proper role of the church, the embezzlers and the victims in moral context. Most of all, none of them morally qualified to carry out the duties.

When Rev. Chul Woo Chang assigned to the church. We expected that he would carry out to clean up the corruption and to recover the abused funds according to your order, the church rule and Christian principles.

Although he pretended to do so at his initial stage of ministry, he did not have enough moral capacity to carry out your order and fell into the offenders' ploys and also he used the occasion for his own political gains by joining the trouble makers, creating one body against justice in favor of the offender Rev. Won Tae Cha and his group. Rev. Chang said in public “Rev. Won Tae Cha is my mentor”.

Meantime openly demonize our family in his wise venture which seems to be out of our common sense as a pastor.

Pastor's Alliance with Abusers
Their Bullying

Now he consolidated the church and the embezzlers into one party against our family as scapegoat again. It is absolutely the pastor's sinful unwise intentional decision contrary to the fact, the courts' and your opinions - most of all in the common clergy moral sense.

Rev. Chul Woo Chang is ministering in the corrupt old church ideas infested with deadly viruses. Consequently his corruption failed to play his real church role to demand the offenders to restitute the abused fund as your office initially ordered the Church to do so.

At this stage the Attorney General's office should clarify the role conflicts realistically and clearly establish the legally proper functions of each party. (The main reason of the conflict is the fact that the church is still under the control of the offenders).

Rescue the fate of the pastor Chul Woo Chang in the moral pitfall, as he has become the de facto leader of the criminal gang. Please sternly advise them for an enlightenment not to stay in the dark room any longer.
The doctrine, the separation of the church and the state should not shield them at all in this mess.

The complex money scandals consequently are shamefully still brewing among the mixed up clergies and his flock in solidarity, scapegoating and demonizing our family as if we are the problems in order to justify their criminal actions for money laundry in the name of the church. The church needs the protection of anti bully law if any. The victims are constantly under their threats.

Abusers Deceived Attorney General

All the offenders - Rev. Chul Woo Chang, the church officers and the brainwashed` members, pretended as if representing the church to your investigation and no positive results but deception came to you from them.

Associate pastor Mark Kim seems to have failed
to define his position in the investigation proceedings seems to be disconnected from the tradition.

Your office over trusted them or seems to have enforced the law in confusion under the influence of their politically powerful attorney Morton Povman as if he was representing the church, but the offenders against "the real church's interest.”

Attorney General's office should understand the situation that their politicking deceived it. Thus, the orders seem to have been applied for the case without a positive result in contrary to the original intention.

The status of the victimized family as scapegoats was invisible to the Attorney General's office although they were the most visible suffering parties during the process of the wise and cruel money laundry schemers, leaving the church in cold.

Following the false information from their attorney your office seemed to have failed implementing your order and enforcing the State law upon them.

Omitting the roles of the victims further weakened your power to exercise the authority effectively over them. Consequently they were benefited from the money laundry as if the victors against our civility.

Please let me further explain the picture how your orders failed to be effectively applied in the disorderly process to mislead your office as follows:


Rev. Chang Blocks Audit
When Ms. Kwang Hee Kim became the chairwoman of the Board, she initiated to recover some of the negligently abandoned trust fund by the smart 9 trustee members. During her term, Ms. Kim had contacted Attorney General's office as he requested, although she initially was not responsive to provide her private address. The abandonment should be investigated if criminally oriented. The entire stolen amount was never known to date.

Initially she was a member of the abusers group.
She was one of the two groups who visited our residence years ago and urged us to settle the $8,000,000 extortion lawsuits by them. She said, she talked with Steven H. Park until 4 A.M., that day mooring.
She was among the brainwashed dummies. However, her role to recover the missing fund was the first lively sign for a positive recovery of the abused fund. It was her brave mind as an amazing renewal sign during the 20 years’ history of this church corruption.
But her recovery efforts seemed to have been appeared as a deadly sting to some in the church group.

Replaced Chairperson
Meantime there was a move to replace the chairwoman Ms. Kim. Mr. Hyun Joong Kim ran for the election of the position.
There were occasions; Mr. Kim nearly two hours talked with Mrs. Sone (Kyung Kim, M.D.), who was a church officers and leader of the group. Mr. Kim asked her that the women's group help Dr. Kid Ok Cho get elected as a trustee who is well qualified, according to their plan.
Rev. Cha made the church meetings to be held at the evenings when many could not come because of the nighttime security concerns. It was his tactic to have his own loyal members come to help him. For only special occasion, women would attend at the evening meetings.

The election night was a special occasion for them because Dr. Cho was to run for an office as her group wished.

Election Gimmick
When the particular meeting was in the evening, they learned that Mr. Kim was candidate himself for a trustee.
But he never informed others that Dr. Cho was going to run for a trustee from the women's group. He seemed to have deceived Mrs. Sone and her group as his men's group falsely promised campaign for Dr. Cho.
But it appeared that Mr. Kim solicited the women’s group for his own interest.
Consequently Mr. Kim did get elected by getting all the extra women' votes.
Dr. Cho naturally did not get enough votes from women alone. The tricks were revealed after the election.
Consequently Mr. Kim replaced Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's chairmanship. Thus Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's recovery efforts of the stolen church money terminated.

The Defendants (Victims) not
Represented for the Investigation
We the victims should have been represented the church for the investigation as they had only reliable resources of information on the motivation of the offenders and to verify the items of evil issues. We had no direct interchange of the data among the related parties in the investigation. The victims did not have chance to verify the data your office had from them for the investigation.
Obviously the conclusion based upon the one sided superficial information.

No Trustees for Church
I understand that Mr. Hyun Joong Kim as the chairman represented the church at your investigation. Technically he did so.
Thus, his information to you was not without prejudice.
Practically he was on the abusers' side as it was further revealed his pro-abuser standing against our family in other occasions as in money laundry.
Consequently it was questionable if his presentation to you was reliable.

Refused Recovery Order
By the end of the investigation, the assistant Attorney General informed me that he advised the new chairman to restore the abused fund.
When I questioned Mr. Kim about the advice, he said he would not do it, as it would cost for the church to restitute the stolen money. Why the cost was his concern when the abusers should pay back the stolen church money to the beloved church?
The Judge Hoahng at the sanctions hearings strongly suggested to recover the money and the church could sue them for damages as Her honor learned all the tactics and perjuries in their attorney's testimony. The court repeatedly warned that they could not sue us. Definitely the church was not a party and we were their victims.
They were not entitled to the church money for their legal costs either.
Also honorable F. Dana Winslow often mentioned the embezzlement would be taken care of fairly by the Attorney General.
Thus, the courts clearly defined 1. The church was not a party. 2. Plaintiffs usurped the name of the church as plaintiffs. 3. They used unauthorized church money for their conspiracy. 4. They did not have any cause to sue us.

Demand Audit from 2000
On July 15, 2007, the church passed Ms. Kwang Hee Kim’s proposal to audit the financial records from 2000 by CPA (not Korean CPA) as she felt her recovery efforts of the missing fund incomplete.
Reverend Chang at the time stated, “I will do it with two other people.” Since then, he is stalling the audit in un-Christian way to cover up his mentor, his colleague's and others' embezzlements.

Fake Demand for Restitution
On December 14, 2008, Mr. Hyun Joong Kim and Mr. Kwang Taeg Rim made a strange proposal to recover the abused trust fund from the abusers.
Mr. & Mrs. Rim was among the deponents who falsely filed affidavits in support of their litigation against us, leading to the murder charges against my son and me that demanded $8 million damages from us.
Now as he is affiliated with Columbia University, he ought to reflect such institutional ethics at least to the church affairs.
It was absolutely questionable on their sincerity as they made unnecessary proposal while they refused to follow the Attorney Generals initial orders to recover the abused fund from them. It appears just as another ploy to cover-up the money laundry to embarrass the victims, to kill time and to deceive the congregation.
After that proposal, during a Sunday lunch period, once I asked him, "How is going on the recovery?"
He was unexpectedly offended by the questioning and reacted shouting at me in public, among other unlikely church words, accused me "as if I was acting as a pressuring landlord to collect rent money." His violent reaction was totally out of the Christian context - it was about the stolen trust fund but a rent. My questioning seemed to have stung his unsettled conscience in adverse to the Attorney General's order.

He said Attorney General not to Audit
34/10/2010The following at the lunch period, In-Taek Rhim, church finance officer remarked, as the abuse was an old mistake and an old issue. Pyung Kyum Kim stated. "You are too old and bringing up the old issues unnecessarily..." These church officers were trying to berry the serious issues as the old mistakes. Their words seem to reflect the intentional cover up of the crimes.
Thus, his December 14th proposal appeared nothing but another cover up trick for them.

Prayer by Money Laundry man
On the Sunday March 14, 2010, Mr. Deuk Joo Chun offered the Sunday prayer on the pulpit who was one of the radical parties to promote the church financed lawsuits against our family. He was a false witness that I assaulted and injured Steven H. Park on the church stairways according to the Park's court testimony for the case of the mass murder charges.
What a scandalous prayer is his?
These are reflections of Rev. Chul Woo Chang's morality allowing such character in "Jesus disguise” pray on the pulpit out of our Christian principles.
Prior to his prayer, he should have confessed his sins and their sins first and return the stolen church money. The transcript of his court testimony will cost $1,300 that would reveal their dept of abuse activities.
His prayer seems to signal another danger to us as the demonstration of their consolidated brutal church gang power without the proper confession in good faith.

Money Laundry Letters
The letter by Young Soo Shin, Young Joo Kwon to Sei Chun that submitted to your investigation, justified the $100,000 loan from the trust fund that was contrary to Steven H. Park's court testimony that the money largely given to Rev. Won Tae Cha - illegal transfer. They were all involved in the money laundry that had no their moral equivalency to the letter or letters.
The recent financial report stated the officers brought back debt records once the pastor removed it.
Sei Chun and others managed $180,000 building renovation project that lost for nothing in 6 months. Kwon Yong Ok was the Building Committee Chair who was an employee of the contractors.
Now the building fund is outside of the Trustees control according to information. It seems to be secretively managed. The Church Building project remains to be seen how it goes as their quality of the people are no better than for the failed case.
Columbia trained, MIT trained, CPA, fake CPA, fake M.D. lawyer and other good-trained smart guys operating the laundry mill, which now Rev. Chul Woo Chang condones. All of their letters on the subject matter in the AG’s investion should be considered laundry letters.

Audit Mockery
Mr. Soon Hi So, so called an in-house auditor of the church, but Rev. Chul Woo Chang is not cooperative for his work fairly according to information. He is not given all the necessary data of the financial transactions that he needed for it several years. According to him there are many missing accounts.

Ineffective State Law
Considering their unconventional function of minds, It was not known what kind papers were submitted to your office in support of their transactions by the abusers. None of their papers could have moved the law for losers' (church) favor according to the factual results as a critical failure sign of the authorities, according our review.
No Recovery of Embezzlement
Paul Choi's embezzlement seemed to have been sanctified in time as a justifiable spending as it is silent about his repayments to the church.
Your office seemed to have failed to properly verify the investigative data with the victims. Eventually your investigation seemed to have ended one sided in favor of the embezzlers and their supporters, as there were not real Church representative or representatives in good faith to seek the recovery.

Murder Charges To Cover up Abuses
Initially Rev. Won Tae Cha created the trouble. In order to protect the trust fund, I, as the chairman tried to prevent the abuse of the trust fund. But our family became their scapegoat for all their applications of the laundry psychology.
My wife, my son and I met unusual cruel extortion lawsuits by them for $8 million. Of course, the tactics were to cover up their embezzlement of the trust fund in this dark immigrant community.
For one case, my son and I were accused as the mass murderers and were on the trial at the NYS Supreme Court. All the wise guys came to the court in support of the false accusations while they wrote false saintly letters in response to your investigation, yet issuing the illicit checks to support the cases. It only could have occurred in the stupid money mad congregation in the state of New York.

Episcopacy lied to Judge
During the trial, the judge F. Dana Winslow mentioned that someone from the bishop's office stated at an ex parte conference that the murder charges were church related. We demanded the bishop and others to reveal who lied to the judge. Bishop Jeremiah J. Park, Super Noel N. Chin, Rev. Won Tae Cha or Chul Woo Chang and others are stone walling to the questions without telling the truth against His will. Where is Jesus in the clergy hearts?

Prejudicial Investigation
Without the victims’ verification of the investigative data of the abused church money, the conclusion seemed to have been done unfairly in the embezzlers' favor as it based upon the offenders' inaccurate pre-judicial information.
In other words, your investigation seems to suggest there was no equal protection for us under the state law; 1) that their abuse of the church money was justified, 2) that the victims' sufferings were ignored or justified and 3) that the church is not protected although she has lost the church money to the embezzlers. The defendants and the church are principal victims. But the criminals had free lunch.

Criminal Rights vs. Civil Rights
Under the circumstances, our civil rights were brutally violated as the state overlooked all the facts including the criminal elements injured us immensely. The end result seems to have favored the criminal rights, making the church loser.
If that is the role of the New York State Law for the church and the victims, it absolutely ineffective in protecting them, favoring the offenders.
All of the offenders, the clergies and the so-called church officers in the same group demonized us to justify their extortion. As the result, the church bullies seem to have won the game with the stolen free money.

Powerful Attorney for Abusers
Their attorney Morton Povman, Esq. revealed in his testimony at the bench that he retained by Young So Kim and Steven H. Park, not by the church. Thus, the plaintiffs and the attorney usurped the church’s name for the lawsuits against us -there was absolutely no representation of the church in the cases. Just they succeeded in cheating the court system. For they were fake plaintiffs in the cases, committing perjuries.
Church Rules Prohibit Lawsuit
For the church rules clearly do not allow personal lawsuits among the members for church's interests.
The justice Hoahng clearly stated on that effect.
Some of the leading profiles; further more, Steven H. Park stated in the court testimony that he had MBA degree from Columbia. Young So Kim made a false statement, as he is a licensed physician in the NY State – false MBA and M.D. degrees.
Once I filed complaint against his false affidavit to the president of the City University. The former pastor Sung Soo Hahn learned Kim's trouble with the president and called me why I made such complaint to the president. He might loose his college job. I told the pastor who was for the troublemakers. I advised him, "why do the church interfere in the problems belong to the state and Young So Kim?" I told him, "I would not honor your sacraments now on as it presided over by such a clergy."
As he had a good political attorney, his position seems to have been secured at the University regardless the perjury.

Free Church Money for Powerful
As the cases suggest, it is OK for any fake church member to steal the church money if one has well coordinating money laundrymen with efficient attorneys. No false affidavits ever punished as in the cases, which is a corrupt danger signal to the lax legal system.

New Law for Protection
of Church and Innocent Victims
We must have a better law for the innocent victims and the church, which should not be left out without legal protection as in this case in the state of New York.
Under this present law, any group could steal any church money tactically with immunity. We believe that there should be a new legislation to protect the church and the innocent victims like us, punishing adequately those whom violate the law.
The new movements such as Tea Party, Coffee Party or New York People’s Convention are lively reflections to combat the dysfunctional system of our government

Toothless Law Empowered Offenders
As they learned the smart tactics and the soft law, the litigants are come back to the church power under the questionable leadership of Rev. Chul Woo Chang who abused the information on the scandals given by Mrs. Sone prior to his appointment.
In fact, after the frivolous lawsuits were sanctioned or ended, the New York State Attorney General and the Judge advised the church to recover the stolen money from the abusers.
But, following the end of the court cases, the stability only short-lived as Rev. Chul Woo Chang has followed his colleague Rev. Won Tae Cha who engineered all the tricks against His will for personal greeds.

Election Campaign for Bishop
Many others believe that Rev. Chul Woo Chang and Rev. Won Tae Cha campaigned for Rev. Jeremiah J. Park's election for bishop.
Although they are his political patrons, he, as the bishop, is now obliged to follow the church rules, the state, federal laws, and obey God to clean up the embezzlement of the church money and other anti-Christian attacks against innocent church members. However, he apparently failed to act promptly as a bishop, acting as in his or her own faction.
The New York City Office of the Bishop located at a walking distance to this church with chronic ills.

Disqualified Clergies
The criminal events in violation of the church creeds suggest the prohibition of their standing on the pulpits as they are in the same scandals against His will. Or they would stay on, as they know the state law works in favor of the persons even if involved in the crime to disgrace His honor. Somebody should stop the sinking Christianity under the leadership of irreligious clergies. We believe the Attorney General could stop the church bullies to rescue the sinking historic Korean church within his jurisdiction.

Re-investigation
You once advised to resubmit the request for further investigation. But the resubmission did not follow through by the office. It was a serious missing link.
Since your orders were not implemented at all to date, Please let me demand you again the reinvestigation for the recovery all of the stolen money, in honor of your office, the church, our family and social justice.
The information in your hand and present letter would provide an additional guidance for your reinvestigation for the good cause.

IN SUMMARY
Reorder to Restitute
Define responsible parties - Church, Abusers, and Victims - to implement the new orders.
Demand the church open the audit of the
Financial data from 2000, as she decided it on July 15, 2007, according to Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's proposal. Rev. Chul Woo Chang is preventing it disgracefully against his own clergy oath.
Please let me know if anyone from your
office advised Mr. in Tack Rhim, "Do not audit," as he once told me so. Mr. Rhim is CPA in his profession. As a church officer has been involved in the most of the illicit check writings in support of the frivolous extortion lawsuits. His violations could be in your jurisdiction. He is responsible party too in all the abuses.
Please order the clergy Chul Woo Chang
and the church to separate the church’s role from the offenders and demand the offenders to restitute the abused money and Save the church according to His wills under your guidance- they violated the church rules and state law.
Thus they are not entitled to any legal
protection at all in the embezzlements.
Unless a common wisdom prevails faithfully for the church, every body is going to be “a fool” as I speak as a fool, except the wise saintly abusers.
Sincerely,
Chae S. Sone
2 Woodbury Court Hicksville, NY 11801
Reference
1. “Methodist politics corruption.” New York Times. April 10, 1982.
Three Ways To truly Rethink Church in NYC " The New Methodists Posted by: chae s. Sone at August 26, 2008 .
Christianity daily. GUILINES FOR DISCIPLESHIP TRAINING INTRDUCTION I took a liberty to name this
4. A petition to Bishop Jeremiah J. Park to recover misused Church
5. Christ Our Life Ministries International - Guestbook
The Christ Our Life Ministries International is a full gospel Christian ministry based in ... Dear Jesus! I am the Korean Bishop Jeremiah J. Park. What can I do for you in this...?

chae s sone

goodthing

chae s sone

FN:AG Andrew Cuomo 4 10. sent
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo
State of New York
Charities Bureau
Nathan Courtney
Office Assistant Attorney General
The Capitol Albany, NY
April 10, 2010

RE: Financial mismanagement
In Korean United Methodist Church and Institute
(Steven H. Park, Paul Choi, Young So Kim among offenders)

Attorney General's Orders
Three Parties
1. Attorney General's order to repay the embezzled $70,000 by Paul Choi.

2. Attorney General's order to restitute the abused church money from the abusers was not complied at all.

Implications of the Orders
And Role Conflicts

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attorney General's Orders

The case began when it called for your attention to the problems created by the church group who lost moral responsibilities in dealing with the church finances.

However, the results seem to indicate the embezzlers won in contrary to the justice as the investigation went along their ways.

Your office has processed the cases in 2003. At the end of the investigation, your office ordered the chairman of the Board, Hyun Joong Kim the restitution of the abused church money, according to information from you. But the restitution had never been initiated because of the church leaders' negligence and the Attorney General's non-interference. The status of repayment of Paul Choi’s embezzlements seems to be unclear.

Consequently all the abusers seem to be gone free with the moneybags without clearing the problems in the money scandals, cheating the church, the congregation, and scapegoating and demonizing the innocent parties which are really losers in contrary to the principles.

Now the Spitzer era has gone, it should be looked into as in a Cuomo era.

We hope that the Attorney General Andrew Cuomo would have a chance to re-evaluate the status for the better resolutions in due diligence than it was done during the Spitzer era.

Please reconsider to enforce the initial orders to restitute the abused funds for the good causes by tracing the issues and the processes that previously applied for the investigation.

I wish your office to reconsider another investigation to do justice for the church victims and the concerned members.

Meantime, I wish to educate myself further on the critical matters to understand what is going on this chaotic relations of the church, state and secular society.

Your initial orders included the basic two categories of the abuses. It was to implement the state law to recover the stolen church money, but not to demand a moral conversion.

1. Attorney General's order to repay the embezzled $70,000 by Paul Choi.

2. Attorney General's order to restitute the abused church money from the abusers was not complied at all.

The order did not clearly define the responsible parties:

Three Parties

They should have been defined three parties:

1. The Hijackers – Offenders- who filed lawsuits against the scapegoats –defendants – Sone family members.

2. The church is an innocent victim under the offenders' destructive ploy. The church as legally and religiously defined – plaintiff – under their ploy by misleading or misled attorneys by the hijackers.

3. Sacrificial lambs – witnesses. Our family fell into their victim as the scapegoats for them to cover up their embezzlements - church hijacking.

The most imperative voices should have been able to come from the church, the Attorney General and the scapegoat - the sacrificial lambs as the witnesses. The offenders should have obeyed the orders but smartly deceived the authorities.

Of course, your orders were the paramount moral imperatives for them.

All offenders had nothing to do with the church affairs but the independent intentional initiations in the criminal actions.

Your action was needed solely for the protection of the integrity of the church as a legally established entity within the law.

Clearly the church should ask the hijackers and the embezzlers to restitute the stolen church money. The question is "Who is the responsible legal church."


Implications of the Orders
And Role Conflicts

The orders were pivotal process to resolve the disgraceful events in this hijacked church.

But there was no moral entity to manage the orders accordingly in the ill church leadership - True church.
If the responsible parties complied with the orders, the complex unpleasant problems could have been resolved in a high degree adequacy.

The victims of these people hoped positive results could come for the church by the responsible persons implementing the orders - the result was disappointing, as there was no clearly defined responsible party - Church.


Church Unable to be the Responsible Party

However, the orders failed to be implemented, as there were no definite responsible parties within the church as there was no "A real church" in the context of the faith in Christ and the church rule.

Meantime, the Attorney General did not interfere in the missing role of the church as the responsible party to recover the abused fund.

When the Attorney General ordered Mr. Hyun Joong Kim, chairman of the Board to recover the missing fund, there was no real church in this "Korean church." Thus, even if the chairman pretended truly representing her interests, his words were not truthful as he represented a church outside of the prerogative church zone.

In fact, a fake church under the embezzlers' leadership acted falsely as if a real church following the orders.

Thus, although the orders were issued in good intention, there was no a responsible party " truthful church" to implement the orders in support of the church's interests except the victims.

Chairman Kim’s excuse, to recover the abused fund could be costly and he did not act. The church has a liability insurance.

The writer wishes let your office would understand that your office fell into the situation in messy deceptive scenario that should be carefully analyzed and cleared the matters to do justice for the church accordingly in honor of your office in light of our civility.

Rev. Chul Woo Chang and so-called church officers
failed to define the proper role of the church, the embezzlers and the victims in moral context. Most of all, none of them morally qualified to carry out the duties.

When Rev. Chul Woo Chang assigned to the church. We expected that he would carry out to clean up the corruption and to recover the abused funds according to your order, the church rule and Christian principles.

Although he pretended to do so at his initial stage of ministry, he did not have enough moral capacity to carry out your order and fell into the offenders' ploys and also he used the occasion for his own political gains by joining the trouble makers, creating one body against justice in favor of the offender Rev. Won Tae Cha and his group. Rev. Chang said in public “Rev. Won Tae Cha is my mentor”.

Meantime openly demonize our family in his wise venture which seems to be out of our common sense as a pastor.

Pastor's Alliance with Abusers
Their Bullying

Now he consolidated the church and the embezzlers into one party against our family as scapegoat again. It is absolutely the pastor's sinful unwise intentional decision contrary to the fact, the courts' and your opinions - most of all in the common clergy moral sense.

Rev. Chul Woo Chang is ministering in the corrupt old church ideas infested with deadly viruses. Consequently his corruption failed to play his real church role to demand the offenders to restitute the abused fund as your office initially ordered the Church to do so.

At this stage the Attorney General's office should clarify the role conflicts realistically and clearly establish the legally proper functions of each party. (The main reason of the conflict is the fact that the church is still under the control of the offenders).

Rescue the fate of the pastor Chul Woo Chang in the moral pitfall, as he has become the de facto leader of the criminal gang. Please sternly advise them for an enlightenment not to stay in the dark room any longer.
The doctrine, the separation of the church and the state should not shield them at all in this mess.

The complex money scandals consequently are shamefully still brewing among the mixed up clergies and his flock in solidarity, scapegoating and demonizing our family as if we are the problems in order to justify their criminal actions for money laundry in the name of the church. The church needs the protection of anti bully law if any. The victims are constantly under their threats.

Abusers Deceived Attorney General

All the offenders - Rev. Chul Woo Chang, the church officers and the brainwashed` members, pretended as if representing the church to your investigation and no positive results but deception came to you from them.

Associate pastor Mark Kim seems to have failed
to define his position in the investigation proceedings seems to be disconnected from the tradition.

Your office over trusted them or seems to have enforced the law in confusion under the influence of their politically powerful attorney Morton Povman as if he was representing the church, but the offenders against "the real church's interest.”

Attorney General's office should understand the situation that their politicking deceived it. Thus, the orders seem to have been applied for the case without a positive result in contrary to the original intention.

The status of the victimized family as scapegoats was invisible to the Attorney General's office although they were the most visible suffering parties during the process of the wise and cruel money laundry schemers, leaving the church in cold.

Following the false information from their attorney your office seemed to have failed implementing your order and enforcing the State law upon them.

Omitting the roles of the victims further weakened your power to exercise the authority effectively over them. Consequently they were benefited from the money laundry as if the victors against our civility.

Please let me further explain the picture how your orders failed to be effectively applied in the disorderly process to mislead your office as follows:


Rev. Chang Blocks Audit
When Ms. Kwang Hee Kim became the chairwoman of the Board, she initiated to recover some of the negligently abandoned trust fund by the smart 9 trustee members. During her term, Ms. Kim had contacted Attorney General's office as he requested, although she initially was not responsive to provide her private address. The abandonment should be investigated if criminally oriented. The entire stolen amount was never known to date.

Initially she was a member of the abusers group.
She was one of the two groups who visited our residence years ago and urged us to settle the $8,000,000 extortion lawsuits by them. She said, she talked with Steven H. Park until 4 A.M., that day mooring.
She was among the brainwashed dummies. However, her role to recover the missing fund was the first lively sign for a positive recovery of the abused fund. It was her brave mind as an amazing renewal sign during the 20 years’ history of this church corruption.
But her recovery efforts seemed to have been appeared as a deadly sting to some in the church group.

Replaced Chairperson
Meantime there was a move to replace the chairwoman Ms. Kim. Mr. Hyun Joong Kim ran for the election of the position.
There were occasions; Mr. Kim nearly two hours talked with Mrs. Sone (Kyung Kim, M.D.), who was a church officers and leader of the group. Mr. Kim asked her that the women's group help Dr. Kid Ok Cho get elected as a trustee who is well qualified, according to their plan.
Rev. Cha made the church meetings to be held at the evenings when many could not come because of the nighttime security concerns. It was his tactic to have his own loyal members come to help him. For only special occasion, women would attend at the evening meetings.

The election night was a special occasion for them because Dr. Cho was to run for an office as her group wished.

Election Gimmick
When the particular meeting was in the evening, they learned that Mr. Kim was candidate himself for a trustee.
But he never informed others that Dr. Cho was going to run for a trustee from the women's group. He seemed to have deceived Mrs. Sone and her group as his men's group falsely promised campaign for Dr. Cho.
But it appeared that Mr. Kim solicited the women’s group for his own interest.
Consequently Mr. Kim did get elected by getting all the extra women' votes.
Dr. Cho naturally did not get enough votes from women alone. The tricks were revealed after the election.
Consequently Mr. Kim replaced Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's chairmanship. Thus Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's recovery efforts of the stolen church money terminated.

The Defendants (Victims) not
Represented for the Investigation
We the victims should have been represented the church for the investigation as they had only reliable resources of information on the motivation of the offenders and to verify the items of evil issues. We had no direct interchange of the data among the related parties in the investigation. The victims did not have chance to verify the data your office had from them for the investigation.
Obviously the conclusion based upon the one sided superficial information.

No Trustees for Church
I understand that Mr. Hyun Joong Kim as the chairman represented the church at your investigation. Technically he did so.
Thus, his information to you was not without prejudice.
Practically he was on the abusers' side as it was further revealed his pro-abuser standing against our family in other occasions as in money laundry.
Consequently it was questionable if his presentation to you was reliable.

Refused Recovery Order
By the end of the investigation, the assistant Attorney General informed me that he advised the new chairman to restore the abused fund.
When I questioned Mr. Kim about the advice, he said he would not do it, as it would cost for the church to restitute the stolen money. Why the cost was his concern when the abusers should pay back the stolen church money to the beloved church?
The Judge Hoahng at the sanctions hearings strongly suggested to recover the money and the church could sue them for damages as Her honor learned all the tactics and perjuries in their attorney's testimony. The court repeatedly warned that they could not sue us. Definitely the church was not a party and we were their victims.
They were not entitled to the church money for their legal costs either.
Also honorable F. Dana Winslow often mentioned the embezzlement would be taken care of fairly by the Attorney General.
Thus, the courts clearly defined 1. The church was not a party. 2. Plaintiffs usurped the name of the church as plaintiffs. 3. They used unauthorized church money for their conspiracy. 4. They did not have any cause to sue us.

Demand Audit from 2000
On July 15, 2007, the church passed Ms. Kwang Hee Kim’s proposal to audit the financial records from 2000 by CPA (not Korean CPA) as she felt her recovery efforts of the missing fund incomplete.
Reverend Chang at the time stated, “I will do it with two other people.” Since then, he is stalling the audit in un-Christian way to cover up his mentor, his colleague's and others' embezzlements.

Fake Demand for Restitution
On December 14, 2008, Mr. Hyun Joong Kim and Mr. Kwang Taeg Rim made a strange proposal to recover the abused trust fund from the abusers.
Mr. & Mrs. Rim was among the deponents who falsely filed affidavits in support of their litigation against us, leading to the murder charges against my son and me that demanded $8 million damages from us.
Now as he is affiliated with Columbia University, he ought to reflect such institutional ethics at least to the church affairs.
It was absolutely questionable on their sincerity as they made unnecessary proposal while they refused to follow the Attorney Generals initial orders to recover the abused fund from them. It appears just as another ploy to cover-up the money laundry to embarrass the victims, to kill time and to deceive the congregation.
After that proposal, during a Sunday lunch period, once I asked him, "How is going on the recovery?"
He was unexpectedly offended by the questioning and reacted shouting at me in public, among other unlikely church words, accused me "as if I was acting as a pressuring landlord to collect rent money." His violent reaction was totally out of the Christian context - it was about the stolen trust fund but a rent. My questioning seemed to have stung his unsettled conscience in adverse to the Attorney General's order.

He said Attorney General not to Audit
34/10/2010The following at the lunch period, In-Taek Rhim, church finance officer remarked, as the abuse was an old mistake and an old issue. Pyung Kyum Kim stated. "You are too old and bringing up the old issues unnecessarily..." These church officers were trying to berry the serious issues as the old mistakes. Their words seem to reflect the intentional cover up of the crimes.
Thus, his December 14th proposal appeared nothing but another cover up trick for them.

Prayer by Money Laundry man
On the Sunday March 14, 2010, Mr. Deuk Joo Chun offered the Sunday prayer on the pulpit who was one of the radical parties to promote the church financed lawsuits against our family. He was a false witness that I assaulted and injured Steven H. Park on the church stairways according to the Park's court testimony for the case of the mass murder charges.
What a scandalous prayer is his?
These are reflections of Rev. Chul Woo Chang's morality allowing such character in "Jesus disguise” pray on the pulpit out of our Christian principles.
Prior to his prayer, he should have confessed his sins and their sins first and return the stolen church money. The transcript of his court testimony will cost $1,300 that would reveal their dept of abuse activities.
His prayer seems to signal another danger to us as the demonstration of their consolidated brutal church gang power without the proper confession in good faith.

Money Laundry Letters
The letter by Young Soo Shin, Young Joo Kwon to Sei Chun that submitted to your investigation, justified the $100,000 loan from the trust fund that was contrary to Steven H. Park's court testimony that the money largely given to Rev. Won Tae Cha - illegal transfer. They were all involved in the money laundry that had no their moral equivalency to the letter or letters.
The recent financial report stated the officers brought back debt records once the pastor removed it.
Sei Chun and others managed $180,000 building renovation project that lost for nothing in 6 months. Kwon Yong Ok was the Building Committee Chair who was an employee of the contractors.
Now the building fund is outside of the Trustees control according to information. It seems to be secretively managed. The Church Building project remains to be seen how it goes as their quality of the people are no better than for the failed case.
Columbia trained, MIT trained, CPA, fake CPA, fake M.D. lawyer and other good-trained smart guys operating the laundry mill, which now Rev. Chul Woo Chang condones. All of their letters on the subject matter in the AG’s investion should be considered laundry letters.

Audit Mockery
Mr. Soon Hi So, so called an in-house auditor of the church, but Rev. Chul Woo Chang is not cooperative for his work fairly according to information. He is not given all the necessary data of the financial transactions that he needed for it several years. According to him there are many missing accounts.

Ineffective State Law
Considering their unconventional function of minds, It was not known what kind papers were submitted to your office in support of their transactions by the abusers. None of their papers could have moved the law for losers' (church) favor according to the factual results as a critical failure sign of the authorities, according our review.
No Recovery of Embezzlement
Paul Choi's embezzlement seemed to have been sanctified in time as a justifiable spending as it is silent about his repayments to the church.
Your office seemed to have failed to properly verify the investigative data with the victims. Eventually your investigation seemed to have ended one sided in favor of the embezzlers and their supporters, as there were not real Church representative or representatives in good faith to seek the recovery.

Murder Charges To Cover up Abuses
Initially Rev. Won Tae Cha created the trouble. In order to protect the trust fund, I, as the chairman tried to prevent the abuse of the trust fund. But our family became their scapegoat for all their applications of the laundry psychology.
My wife, my son and I met unusual cruel extortion lawsuits by them for $8 million. Of course, the tactics were to cover up their embezzlement of the trust fund in this dark immigrant community.
For one case, my son and I were accused as the mass murderers and were on the trial at the NYS Supreme Court. All the wise guys came to the court in support of the false accusations while they wrote false saintly letters in response to your investigation, yet issuing the illicit checks to support the cases. It only could have occurred in the stupid money mad congregation in the state of New York.

Episcopacy lied to Judge
During the trial, the judge F. Dana Winslow mentioned that someone from the bishop's office stated at an ex parte conference that the murder charges were church related. We demanded the bishop and others to reveal who lied to the judge. Bishop Jeremiah J. Park, Super Noel N. Chin, Rev. Won Tae Cha or Chul Woo Chang and others are stone walling to the questions without telling the truth against His will. Where is Jesus in the clergy hearts?

Prejudicial Investigation
Without the victims’ verification of the investigative data of the abused church money, the conclusion seemed to have been done unfairly in the embezzlers' favor as it based upon the offenders' inaccurate pre-judicial information.
In other words, your investigation seems to suggest there was no equal protection for us under the state law; 1) that their abuse of the church money was justified, 2) that the victims' sufferings were ignored or justified and 3) that the church is not protected although she has lost the church money to the embezzlers. The defendants and the church are principal victims. But the criminals had free lunch.

Criminal Rights vs. Civil Rights
Under the circumstances, our civil rights were brutally violated as the state overlooked all the facts including the criminal elements injured us immensely. The end result seems to have favored the criminal rights, making the church loser.
If that is the role of the New York State Law for the church and the victims, it absolutely ineffective in protecting them, favoring the offenders.
All of the offenders, the clergies and the so-called church officers in the same group demonized us to justify their extortion. As the result, the church bullies seem to have won the game with the stolen free money.

Powerful Attorney for Abusers
Their attorney Morton Povman, Esq. revealed in his testimony at the bench that he retained by Young So Kim and Steven H. Park, not by the church. Thus, the plaintiffs and the attorney usurped the church’s name for the lawsuits against us -there was absolutely no representation of the church in the cases. Just they succeeded in cheating the court system. For they were fake plaintiffs in the cases, committing perjuries.
Church Rules Prohibit Lawsuit
For the church rules clearly do not allow personal lawsuits among the members for church's interests.
The justice Hoahng clearly stated on that effect.
Some of the leading profiles; further more, Steven H. Park stated in the court testimony that he had MBA degree from Columbia. Young So Kim made a false statement, as he is a licensed physician in the NY State – false MBA and M.D. degrees.
Once I filed complaint against his false affidavit to the president of the City University. The former pastor Sung Soo Hahn learned Kim's trouble with the president and called me why I made such complaint to the president. He might loose his college job. I told the pastor who was for the troublemakers. I advised him, "why do the church interfere in the problems belong to the state and Young So Kim?" I told him, "I would not honor your sacraments now on as it presided over by such a clergy."
As he had a good political attorney, his position seems to have been secured at the University regardless the perjury.

Free Church Money for Powerful
As the cases suggest, it is OK for any fake church member to steal the church money if one has well coordinating money laundrymen with efficient attorneys. No false affidavits ever punished as in the cases, which is a corrupt danger signal to the lax legal system.

New Law for Protection
of Church and Innocent Victims
We must have a better law for the innocent victims and the church, which should not be left out without legal protection as in this case in the state of New York.
Under this present law, any group could steal any church money tactically with immunity. We believe that there should be a new legislation to protect the church and the innocent victims like us, punishing adequately those whom violate the law.
The new movements such as Tea Party, Coffee Party or New York People’s Convention are lively reflections to combat the dysfunctional system of our government

Toothless Law Empowered Offenders
As they learned the smart tactics and the soft law, the litigants are come back to the church power under the questionable leadership of Rev. Chul Woo Chang who abused the information on the scandals given by Mrs. Sone prior to his appointment.
In fact, after the frivolous lawsuits were sanctioned or ended, the New York State Attorney General and the Judge advised the church to recover the stolen money from the abusers.
But, following the end of the court cases, the stability only short-lived as Rev. Chul Woo Chang has followed his colleague Rev. Won Tae Cha who engineered all the tricks against His will for personal greeds.

Election Campaign for Bishop
Many others believe that Rev. Chul Woo Chang and Rev. Won Tae Cha campaigned for Rev. Jeremiah J. Park's election for bishop.
Although they are his political patrons, he, as the bishop, is now obliged to follow the church rules, the state, federal laws, and obey God to clean up the embezzlement of the church money and other anti-Christian attacks against innocent church members. However, he apparently failed to act promptly as a bishop, acting as in his or her own faction.
The New York City Office of the Bishop located at a walking distance to this church with chronic ills.

Disqualified Clergies
The criminal events in violation of the church creeds suggest the prohibition of their standing on the pulpits as they are in the same scandals against His will. Or they would stay on, as they know the state law works in favor of the persons even if involved in the crime to disgrace His honor. Somebody should stop the sinking Christianity under the leadership of irreligious clergies. We believe the Attorney General could stop the church bullies to rescue the sinking historic Korean church within his jurisdiction.

Re-investigation
You once advised to resubmit the request for further investigation. But the resubmission did not follow through by the office. It was a serious missing link.
Since your orders were not implemented at all to date, Please let me demand you again the reinvestigation for the recovery all of the stolen money, in honor of your office, the church, our family and social justice.
The information in your hand and present letter would provide an additional guidance for your reinvestigation for the good cause.

IN SUMMARY
Reorder to Restitute
Define responsible parties - Church, Abusers, and Victims - to implement the new orders.
Demand the church open the audit of the
Financial data from 2000, as she decided it on July 15, 2007, according to Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's proposal. Rev. Chul Woo Chang is preventing it disgracefully against his own clergy oath.
Please let me know if anyone from your
office advised Mr. in Tack Rhim, "Do not audit," as he once told me so. Mr. Rhim is CPA in his profession. As a church officer has been involved in the most of the illicit check writings in support of the frivolous extortion lawsuits. His violations could be in your jurisdiction. He is responsible party too in all the abuses.
Please order the clergy Chul Woo Chang
and the church to separate the church’s role from the offenders and demand the offenders to restitute the abused money and Save the church according to His wills under your guidance- they violated the church rules and state law.
Thus they are not entitled to any legal
protection at all in the embezzlements.
Unless a common wisdom prevails faithfully for the church, every body is going to be “a fool” as I speak as a fool, except the wise saintly abusers.
Sincerely,
Chae S. Sone
2 Woodbury Court Hicksville, NY 11801
Reference
1. “Methodist politics corruption.” New York Times. April 10, 1982.
Three Ways To truly Rethink Church in NYC " The New Methodists Posted by: chae s. Sone at August 26, 2008 .
Christianity daily. GUILINES FOR DISCIPLESHIP TRAINING INTRDUCTION I took a liberty to name this
4. A petition to Bishop Jeremiah J. Park to recover misused Church
5. Christ Our Life Ministries International - Guestbook
The Christ Our Life Ministries International is a full gospel Christian ministry based in ... Dear Jesus! I am the Korean Bishop Jeremiah J. Park. What can I do for you in this...?

chae s sone

FN:AG Andrew Cuomo 4 10. sent
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo
State of New York
Charities Bureau
Nathan Courtney
Office Assistant Attorney General
The Capitol Albany, NY
April 10, 2010

RE: Financial mismanagement
In Korean United Methodist Church and Institute
(Steven H. Park, Paul Choi, Young So Kim among offenders)

Attorney General's Orders
Three Parties
1. Attorney General's order to repay the embezzled $70,000 by Paul Choi.

2. Attorney General's order to restitute the abused church money from the abusers was not complied at all.

Implications of the Orders
And Role Conflicts

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attorney General's Orders

The case began when it called for your attention to the problems created by the church group who lost moral responsibilities in dealing with the church finances.

However, the results seem to indicate the embezzlers won in contrary to the justice as the investigation went along their ways.

Your office has processed the cases in 2003. At the end of the investigation, your office ordered the chairman of the Board, Hyun Joong Kim the restitution of the abused church money, according to information from you. But the restitution had never been initiated because of the church leaders' negligence and the Attorney General's non-interference. The status of repayment of Paul Choi’s embezzlements seems to be unclear.

Consequently all the abusers seem to be gone free with the moneybags without clearing the problems in the money scandals, cheating the church, the congregation, and scapegoating and demonizing the innocent parties which are really losers in contrary to the principles.

Now the Spitzer era has gone, it should be looked into as in a Cuomo era.

We hope that the Attorney General Andrew Cuomo would have a chance to re-evaluate the status for the better resolutions in due diligence than it was done during the Spitzer era.

Please reconsider to enforce the initial orders to restitute the abused funds for the good causes by tracing the issues and the processes that previously applied for the investigation.

I wish your office to reconsider another investigation to do justice for the church victims and the concerned members.

Meantime, I wish to educate myself further on the critical matters to understand what is going on this chaotic relations of the church, state and secular society.

Your initial orders included the basic two categories of the abuses. It was to implement the state law to recover the stolen church money, but not to demand a moral conversion.

1. Attorney General's order to repay the embezzled $70,000 by Paul Choi.

2. Attorney General's order to restitute the abused church money from the abusers was not complied at all.

The order did not clearly define the responsible parties:

Three Parties

They should have been defined three parties:

1. The Hijackers – Offenders- who filed lawsuits against the scapegoats –defendants – Sone family members.

2. The church is an innocent victim under the offenders' destructive ploy. The church as legally and religiously defined – plaintiff – under their ploy by misleading or misled attorneys by the hijackers.

3. Sacrificial lambs – witnesses. Our family fell into their victim as the scapegoats for them to cover up their embezzlements - church hijacking.

The most imperative voices should have been able to come from the church, the Attorney General and the scapegoat - the sacrificial lambs as the witnesses. The offenders should have obeyed the orders but smartly deceived the authorities.

Of course, your orders were the paramount moral imperatives for them.

All offenders had nothing to do with the church affairs but the independent intentional initiations in the criminal actions.

Your action was needed solely for the protection of the integrity of the church as a legally established entity within the law.

Clearly the church should ask the hijackers and the embezzlers to restitute the stolen church money. The question is "Who is the responsible legal church."


Implications of the Orders
And Role Conflicts

The orders were pivotal process to resolve the disgraceful events in this hijacked church.

But there was no moral entity to manage the orders accordingly in the ill church leadership - True church.
If the responsible parties complied with the orders, the complex unpleasant problems could have been resolved in a high degree adequacy.

The victims of these people hoped positive results could come for the church by the responsible persons implementing the orders - the result was disappointing, as there was no clearly defined responsible party - Church.


Church Unable to be the Responsible Party

However, the orders failed to be implemented, as there were no definite responsible parties within the church as there was no "A real church" in the context of the faith in Christ and the church rule.

Meantime, the Attorney General did not interfere in the missing role of the church as the responsible party to recover the abused fund.

When the Attorney General ordered Mr. Hyun Joong Kim, chairman of the Board to recover the missing fund, there was no real church in this "Korean church." Thus, even if the chairman pretended truly representing her interests, his words were not truthful as he represented a church outside of the prerogative church zone.

In fact, a fake church under the embezzlers' leadership acted falsely as if a real church following the orders.

Thus, although the orders were issued in good intention, there was no a responsible party " truthful church" to implement the orders in support of the church's interests except the victims.

Chairman Kim’s excuse, to recover the abused fund could be costly and he did not act. The church has a liability insurance.

The writer wishes let your office would understand that your office fell into the situation in messy deceptive scenario that should be carefully analyzed and cleared the matters to do justice for the church accordingly in honor of your office in light of our civility.

Rev. Chul Woo Chang and so-called church officers
failed to define the proper role of the church, the embezzlers and the victims in moral context. Most of all, none of them morally qualified to carry out the duties.

When Rev. Chul Woo Chang assigned to the church. We expected that he would carry out to clean up the corruption and to recover the abused funds according to your order, the church rule and Christian principles.

Although he pretended to do so at his initial stage of ministry, he did not have enough moral capacity to carry out your order and fell into the offenders' ploys and also he used the occasion for his own political gains by joining the trouble makers, creating one body against justice in favor of the offender Rev. Won Tae Cha and his group. Rev. Chang said in public “Rev. Won Tae Cha is my mentor”.

Meantime openly demonize our family in his wise venture which seems to be out of our common sense as a pastor.

Pastor's Alliance with Abusers
Their Bullying

Now he consolidated the church and the embezzlers into one party against our family as scapegoat again. It is absolutely the pastor's sinful unwise intentional decision contrary to the fact, the courts' and your opinions - most of all in the common clergy moral sense.

Rev. Chul Woo Chang is ministering in the corrupt old church ideas infested with deadly viruses. Consequently his corruption failed to play his real church role to demand the offenders to restitute the abused fund as your office initially ordered the Church to do so.

At this stage the Attorney General's office should clarify the role conflicts realistically and clearly establish the legally proper functions of each party. (The main reason of the conflict is the fact that the church is still under the control of the offenders).

Rescue the fate of the pastor Chul Woo Chang in the moral pitfall, as he has become the de facto leader of the criminal gang. Please sternly advise them for an enlightenment not to stay in the dark room any longer.
The doctrine, the separation of the church and the state should not shield them at all in this mess.

The complex money scandals consequently are shamefully still brewing among the mixed up clergies and his flock in solidarity, scapegoating and demonizing our family as if we are the problems in order to justify their criminal actions for money laundry in the name of the church. The church needs the protection of anti bully law if any. The victims are constantly under their threats.

Abusers Deceived Attorney General

All the offenders - Rev. Chul Woo Chang, the church officers and the brainwashed` members, pretended as if representing the church to your investigation and no positive results but deception came to you from them.

Associate pastor Mark Kim seems to have failed
to define his position in the investigation proceedings seems to be disconnected from the tradition.

Your office over trusted them or seems to have enforced the law in confusion under the influence of their politically powerful attorney Morton Povman as if he was representing the church, but the offenders against "the real church's interest.”

Attorney General's office should understand the situation that their politicking deceived it. Thus, the orders seem to have been applied for the case without a positive result in contrary to the original intention.

The status of the victimized family as scapegoats was invisible to the Attorney General's office although they were the most visible suffering parties during the process of the wise and cruel money laundry schemers, leaving the church in cold.

Following the false information from their attorney your office seemed to have failed implementing your order and enforcing the State law upon them.

Omitting the roles of the victims further weakened your power to exercise the authority effectively over them. Consequently they were benefited from the money laundry as if the victors against our civility.

Please let me further explain the picture how your orders failed to be effectively applied in the disorderly process to mislead your office as follows:


Rev. Chang Blocks Audit
When Ms. Kwang Hee Kim became the chairwoman of the Board, she initiated to recover some of the negligently abandoned trust fund by the smart 9 trustee members. During her term, Ms. Kim had contacted Attorney General's office as he requested, although she initially was not responsive to provide her private address. The abandonment should be investigated if criminally oriented. The entire stolen amount was never known to date.

Initially she was a member of the abusers group.
She was one of the two groups who visited our residence years ago and urged us to settle the $8,000,000 extortion lawsuits by them. She said, she talked with Steven H. Park until 4 A.M., that day mooring.
She was among the brainwashed dummies. However, her role to recover the missing fund was the first lively sign for a positive recovery of the abused fund. It was her brave mind as an amazing renewal sign during the 20 years’ history of this church corruption.
But her recovery efforts seemed to have been appeared as a deadly sting to some in the church group.

Replaced Chairperson
Meantime there was a move to replace the chairwoman Ms. Kim. Mr. Hyun Joong Kim ran for the election of the position.
There were occasions; Mr. Kim nearly two hours talked with Mrs. Sone (Kyung Kim, M.D.), who was a church officers and leader of the group. Mr. Kim asked her that the women's group help Dr. Kid Ok Cho get elected as a trustee who is well qualified, according to their plan.
Rev. Cha made the church meetings to be held at the evenings when many could not come because of the nighttime security concerns. It was his tactic to have his own loyal members come to help him. For only special occasion, women would attend at the evening meetings.

The election night was a special occasion for them because Dr. Cho was to run for an office as her group wished.

Election Gimmick
When the particular meeting was in the evening, they learned that Mr. Kim was candidate himself for a trustee.
But he never informed others that Dr. Cho was going to run for a trustee from the women's group. He seemed to have deceived Mrs. Sone and her group as his men's group falsely promised campaign for Dr. Cho.
But it appeared that Mr. Kim solicited the women’s group for his own interest.
Consequently Mr. Kim did get elected by getting all the extra women' votes.
Dr. Cho naturally did not get enough votes from women alone. The tricks were revealed after the election.
Consequently Mr. Kim replaced Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's chairmanship. Thus Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's recovery efforts of the stolen church money terminated.

The Defendants (Victims) not
Represented for the Investigation
We the victims should have been represented the church for the investigation as they had only reliable resources of information on the motivation of the offenders and to verify the items of evil issues. We had no direct interchange of the data among the related parties in the investigation. The victims did not have chance to verify the data your office had from them for the investigation.
Obviously the conclusion based upon the one sided superficial information.

No Trustees for Church
I understand that Mr. Hyun Joong Kim as the chairman represented the church at your investigation. Technically he did so.
Thus, his information to you was not without prejudice.
Practically he was on the abusers' side as it was further revealed his pro-abuser standing against our family in other occasions as in money laundry.
Consequently it was questionable if his presentation to you was reliable.

Refused Recovery Order
By the end of the investigation, the assistant Attorney General informed me that he advised the new chairman to restore the abused fund.
When I questioned Mr. Kim about the advice, he said he would not do it, as it would cost for the church to restitute the stolen money. Why the cost was his concern when the abusers should pay back the stolen church money to the beloved church?
The Judge Hoahng at the sanctions hearings strongly suggested to recover the money and the church could sue them for damages as Her honor learned all the tactics and perjuries in their attorney's testimony. The court repeatedly warned that they could not sue us. Definitely the church was not a party and we were their victims.
They were not entitled to the church money for their legal costs either.
Also honorable F. Dana Winslow often mentioned the embezzlement would be taken care of fairly by the Attorney General.
Thus, the courts clearly defined 1. The church was not a party. 2. Plaintiffs usurped the name of the church as plaintiffs. 3. They used unauthorized church money for their conspiracy. 4. They did not have any cause to sue us.

Demand Audit from 2000
On July 15, 2007, the church passed Ms. Kwang Hee Kim’s proposal to audit the financial records from 2000 by CPA (not Korean CPA) as she felt her recovery efforts of the missing fund incomplete.
Reverend Chang at the time stated, “I will do it with two other people.” Since then, he is stalling the audit in un-Christian way to cover up his mentor, his colleague's and others' embezzlements.

Fake Demand for Restitution
On December 14, 2008, Mr. Hyun Joong Kim and Mr. Kwang Taeg Rim made a strange proposal to recover the abused trust fund from the abusers.
Mr. & Mrs. Rim was among the deponents who falsely filed affidavits in support of their litigation against us, leading to the murder charges against my son and me that demanded $8 million damages from us.
Now as he is affiliated with Columbia University, he ought to reflect such institutional ethics at least to the church affairs.
It was absolutely questionable on their sincerity as they made unnecessary proposal while they refused to follow the Attorney Generals initial orders to recover the abused fund from them. It appears just as another ploy to cover-up the money laundry to embarrass the victims, to kill time and to deceive the congregation.
After that proposal, during a Sunday lunch period, once I asked him, "How is going on the recovery?"
He was unexpectedly offended by the questioning and reacted shouting at me in public, among other unlikely church words, accused me "as if I was acting as a pressuring landlord to collect rent money." His violent reaction was totally out of the Christian context - it was about the stolen trust fund but a rent. My questioning seemed to have stung his unsettled conscience in adverse to the Attorney General's order.

He said Attorney General not to Audit
34/10/2010The following at the lunch period, In-Taek Rhim, church finance officer remarked, as the abuse was an old mistake and an old issue. Pyung Kyum Kim stated. "You are too old and bringing up the old issues unnecessarily..." These church officers were trying to berry the serious issues as the old mistakes. Their words seem to reflect the intentional cover up of the crimes.
Thus, his December 14th proposal appeared nothing but another cover up trick for them.

Prayer by Money Laundry man
On the Sunday March 14, 2010, Mr. Deuk Joo Chun offered the Sunday prayer on the pulpit who was one of the radical parties to promote the church financed lawsuits against our family. He was a false witness that I assaulted and injured Steven H. Park on the church stairways according to the Park's court testimony for the case of the mass murder charges.
What a scandalous prayer is his?
These are reflections of Rev. Chul Woo Chang's morality allowing such character in "Jesus disguise” pray on the pulpit out of our Christian principles.
Prior to his prayer, he should have confessed his sins and their sins first and return the stolen church money. The transcript of his court testimony will cost $1,300 that would reveal their dept of abuse activities.
His prayer seems to signal another danger to us as the demonstration of their consolidated brutal church gang power without the proper confession in good faith.

Money Laundry Letters
The letter by Young Soo Shin, Young Joo Kwon to Sei Chun that submitted to your investigation, justified the $100,000 loan from the trust fund that was contrary to Steven H. Park's court testimony that the money largely given to Rev. Won Tae Cha - illegal transfer. They were all involved in the money laundry that had no their moral equivalency to the letter or letters.
The recent financial report stated the officers brought back debt records once the pastor removed it.
Sei Chun and others managed $180,000 building renovation project that lost for nothing in 6 months. Kwon Yong Ok was the Building Committee Chair who was an employee of the contractors.
Now the building fund is outside of the Trustees control according to information. It seems to be secretively managed. The Church Building project remains to be seen how it goes as their quality of the people are no better than for the failed case.
Columbia trained, MIT trained, CPA, fake CPA, fake M.D. lawyer and other good-trained smart guys operating the laundry mill, which now Rev. Chul Woo Chang condones. All of their letters on the subject matter in the AG’s investion should be considered laundry letters.

Audit Mockery
Mr. Soon Hi So, so called an in-house auditor of the church, but Rev. Chul Woo Chang is not cooperative for his work fairly according to information. He is not given all the necessary data of the financial transactions that he needed for it several years. According to him there are many missing accounts.

Ineffective State Law
Considering their unconventional function of minds, It was not known what kind papers were submitted to your office in support of their transactions by the abusers. None of their papers could have moved the law for losers' (church) favor according to the factual results as a critical failure sign of the authorities, according our review.
No Recovery of Embezzlement
Paul Choi's embezzlement seemed to have been sanctified in time as a justifiable spending as it is silent about his repayments to the church.
Your office seemed to have failed to properly verify the investigative data with the victims. Eventually your investigation seemed to have ended one sided in favor of the embezzlers and their supporters, as there were not real Church representative or representatives in good faith to seek the recovery.

Murder Charges To Cover up Abuses
Initially Rev. Won Tae Cha created the trouble. In order to protect the trust fund, I, as the chairman tried to prevent the abuse of the trust fund. But our family became their scapegoat for all their applications of the laundry psychology.
My wife, my son and I met unusual cruel extortion lawsuits by them for $8 million. Of course, the tactics were to cover up their embezzlement of the trust fund in this dark immigrant community.
For one case, my son and I were accused as the mass murderers and were on the trial at the NYS Supreme Court. All the wise guys came to the court in support of the false accusations while they wrote false saintly letters in response to your investigation, yet issuing the illicit checks to support the cases. It only could have occurred in the stupid money mad congregation in the state of New York.

Episcopacy lied to Judge
During the trial, the judge F. Dana Winslow mentioned that someone from the bishop's office stated at an ex parte conference that the murder charges were church related. We demanded the bishop and others to reveal who lied to the judge. Bishop Jeremiah J. Park, Super Noel N. Chin, Rev. Won Tae Cha or Chul Woo Chang and others are stone walling to the questions without telling the truth against His will. Where is Jesus in the clergy hearts?

Prejudicial Investigation
Without the victims’ verification of the investigative data of the abused church money, the conclusion seemed to have been done unfairly in the embezzlers' favor as it based upon the offenders' inaccurate pre-judicial information.
In other words, your investigation seems to suggest there was no equal protection for us under the state law; 1) that their abuse of the church money was justified, 2) that the victims' sufferings were ignored or justified and 3) that the church is not protected although she has lost the church money to the embezzlers. The defendants and the church are principal victims. But the criminals had free lunch.

Criminal Rights vs. Civil Rights
Under the circumstances, our civil rights were brutally violated as the state overlooked all the facts including the criminal elements injured us immensely. The end result seems to have favored the criminal rights, making the church loser.
If that is the role of the New York State Law for the church and the victims, it absolutely ineffective in protecting them, favoring the offenders.
All of the offenders, the clergies and the so-called church officers in the same group demonized us to justify their extortion. As the result, the church bullies seem to have won the game with the stolen free money.

Powerful Attorney for Abusers
Their attorney Morton Povman, Esq. revealed in his testimony at the bench that he retained by Young So Kim and Steven H. Park, not by the church. Thus, the plaintiffs and the attorney usurped the church’s name for the lawsuits against us -there was absolutely no representation of the church in the cases. Just they succeeded in cheating the court system. For they were fake plaintiffs in the cases, committing perjuries.
Church Rules Prohibit Lawsuit
For the church rules clearly do not allow personal lawsuits among the members for church's interests.
The justice Hoahng clearly stated on that effect.
Some of the leading profiles; further more, Steven H. Park stated in the court testimony that he had MBA degree from Columbia. Young So Kim made a false statement, as he is a licensed physician in the NY State – false MBA and M.D. degrees.
Once I filed complaint against his false affidavit to the president of the City University. The former pastor Sung Soo Hahn learned Kim's trouble with the president and called me why I made such complaint to the president. He might loose his college job. I told the pastor who was for the troublemakers. I advised him, "why do the church interfere in the problems belong to the state and Young So Kim?" I told him, "I would not honor your sacraments now on as it presided over by such a clergy."
As he had a good political attorney, his position seems to have been secured at the University regardless the perjury.

Free Church Money for Powerful
As the cases suggest, it is OK for any fake church member to steal the church money if one has well coordinating money laundrymen with efficient attorneys. No false affidavits ever punished as in the cases, which is a corrupt danger signal to the lax legal system.

New Law for Protection
of Church and Innocent Victims
We must have a better law for the innocent victims and the church, which should not be left out without legal protection as in this case in the state of New York.
Under this present law, any group could steal any church money tactically with immunity. We believe that there should be a new legislation to protect the church and the innocent victims like us, punishing adequately those whom violate the law.
The new movements such as Tea Party, Coffee Party or New York People’s Convention are lively reflections to combat the dysfunctional system of our government

Toothless Law Empowered Offenders
As they learned the smart tactics and the soft law, the litigants are come back to the church power under the questionable leadership of Rev. Chul Woo Chang who abused the information on the scandals given by Mrs. Sone prior to his appointment.
In fact, after the frivolous lawsuits were sanctioned or ended, the New York State Attorney General and the Judge advised the church to recover the stolen money from the abusers.
But, following the end of the court cases, the stability only short-lived as Rev. Chul Woo Chang has followed his colleague Rev. Won Tae Cha who engineered all the tricks against His will for personal greeds.

Election Campaign for Bishop
Many others believe that Rev. Chul Woo Chang and Rev. Won Tae Cha campaigned for Rev. Jeremiah J. Park's election for bishop.
Although they are his political patrons, he, as the bishop, is now obliged to follow the church rules, the state, federal laws, and obey God to clean up the embezzlement of the church money and other anti-Christian attacks against innocent church members. However, he apparently failed to act promptly as a bishop, acting as in his or her own faction.
The New York City Office of the Bishop located at a walking distance to this church with chronic ills.

Disqualified Clergies
The criminal events in violation of the church creeds suggest the prohibition of their standing on the pulpits as they are in the same scandals against His will. Or they would stay on, as they know the state law works in favor of the persons even if involved in the crime to disgrace His honor. Somebody should stop the sinking Christianity under the leadership of irreligious clergies. We believe the Attorney General could stop the church bullies to rescue the sinking historic Korean church within his jurisdiction.

Re-investigation
You once advised to resubmit the request for further investigation. But the resubmission did not follow through by the office. It was a serious missing link.
Since your orders were not implemented at all to date, Please let me demand you again the reinvestigation for the recovery all of the stolen money, in honor of your office, the church, our family and social justice.
The information in your hand and present letter would provide an additional guidance for your reinvestigation for the good cause.

IN SUMMARY
Reorder to Restitute
Define responsible parties - Church, Abusers, and Victims - to implement the new orders.
Demand the church open the audit of the
Financial data from 2000, as she decided it on July 15, 2007, according to Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's proposal. Rev. Chul Woo Chang is preventing it disgracefully against his own clergy oath.
Please let me know if anyone from your
office advised Mr. in Tack Rhim, "Do not audit," as he once told me so. Mr. Rhim is CPA in his profession. As a church officer has been involved in the most of the illicit check writings in support of the frivolous extortion lawsuits. His violations could be in your jurisdiction. He is responsible party too in all the abuses.
Please order the clergy Chul Woo Chang
and the church to separate the church’s role from the offenders and demand the offenders to restitute the abused money and Save the church according to His wills under your guidance- they violated the church rules and state law.
Thus they are not entitled to any legal
protection at all in the embezzlements.
Unless a common wisdom prevails faithfully for the church, every body is going to be “a fool” as I speak as a fool, except the wise saintly abusers.
Sincerely,
Chae S. Sone
2 Woodbury Court Hicksville, NY 11801
Reference
1. “Methodist politics corruption.” New York Times. April 10, 1982.
Three Ways To truly Rethink Church in NYC " The New Methodists Posted by: chae s. Sone at August 26, 2008 .
Christianity daily. GUILINES FOR DISCIPLESHIP TRAINING INTRDUCTION I took a liberty to name this
4. A petition to Bishop Jeremiah J. Park to recover misused Church
5. Christ Our Life Ministries International - Guestbook
The Christ Our Life Ministries International is a full gospel Christian ministry based in ... Dear Jesus! I am the Korean Bishop Jeremiah J. Park. What can I do for you in this...?

chae s sone

FN:AG Andrew Cuomo 4 10. sent
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo
State of New York
Charities Bureau
Nathan Courtney
Office Assistant Attorney General
The Capitol Albany, NY
April 10, 2010

RE: Financial mismanagement
In Korean United Methodist Church and Institute
(Steven H. Park, Paul Choi, Young So Kim among offenders)

Attorney General's Orders
Three Parties
1. Attorney General's order to repay the embezzled $70,000 by Paul Choi.

2. Attorney General's order to restitute the abused church money from the abusers was not complied at all.

Implications of the Orders
And Role Conflicts

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attorney General's Orders

The case began when it called for your attention to the problems created by the church group who lost moral responsibilities in dealing with the church finances.

However, the results seem to indicate the embezzlers won in contrary to the justice as the investigation went along their ways.

Your office has processed the cases in 2003. At the end of the investigation, your office ordered the chairman of the Board, Hyun Joong Kim the restitution of the abused church money, according to information from you. But the restitution had never been initiated because of the church leaders' negligence and the Attorney General's non-interference. The status of repayment of Paul Choi’s embezzlements seems to be unclear.

Consequently all the abusers seem to be gone free with the moneybags without clearing the problems in the money scandals, cheating the church, the congregation, and scapegoating and demonizing the innocent parties which are really losers in contrary to the principles.

Now the Spitzer era has gone, it should be looked into as in a Cuomo era.

We hope that the Attorney General Andrew Cuomo would have a chance to re-evaluate the status for the better resolutions in due diligence than it was done during the Spitzer era.

Please reconsider to enforce the initial orders to restitute the abused funds for the good causes by tracing the issues and the processes that previously applied for the investigation.

I wish your office to reconsider another investigation to do justice for the church victims and the concerned members.

Meantime, I wish to educate myself further on the critical matters to understand what is going on this chaotic relations of the church, state and secular society.

Your initial orders included the basic two categories of the abuses. It was to implement the state law to recover the stolen church money, but not to demand a moral conversion.

1. Attorney General's order to repay the embezzled $70,000 by Paul Choi.

2. Attorney General's order to restitute the abused church money from the abusers was not complied at all.

The order did not clearly define the responsible parties:

Three Parties

They should have been defined three parties:

1. The Hijackers – Offenders- who filed lawsuits against the scapegoats –defendants – Sone family members.

2. The church is an innocent victim under the offenders' destructive ploy. The church as legally and religiously defined – plaintiff – under their ploy by misleading or misled attorneys by the hijackers.

3. Sacrificial lambs – witnesses. Our family fell into their victim as the scapegoats for them to cover up their embezzlements - church hijacking.

The most imperative voices should have been able to come from the church, the Attorney General and the scapegoat - the sacrificial lambs as the witnesses. The offenders should have obeyed the orders but smartly deceived the authorities.

Of course, your orders were the paramount moral imperatives for them.

All offenders had nothing to do with the church affairs but the independent intentional initiations in the criminal actions.

Your action was needed solely for the protection of the integrity of the church as a legally established entity within the law.

Clearly the church should ask the hijackers and the embezzlers to restitute the stolen church money. The question is "Who is the responsible legal church."


Implications of the Orders
And Role Conflicts

The orders were pivotal process to resolve the disgraceful events in this hijacked church.

But there was no moral entity to manage the orders accordingly in the ill church leadership - True church.
If the responsible parties complied with the orders, the complex unpleasant problems could have been resolved in a high degree adequacy.

The victims of these people hoped positive results could come for the church by the responsible persons implementing the orders - the result was disappointing, as there was no clearly defined responsible party - Church.


Church Unable to be the Responsible Party

However, the orders failed to be implemented, as there were no definite responsible parties within the church as there was no "A real church" in the context of the faith in Christ and the church rule.

Meantime, the Attorney General did not interfere in the missing role of the church as the responsible party to recover the abused fund.

When the Attorney General ordered Mr. Hyun Joong Kim, chairman of the Board to recover the missing fund, there was no real church in this "Korean church." Thus, even if the chairman pretended truly representing her interests, his words were not truthful as he represented a church outside of the prerogative church zone.

In fact, a fake church under the embezzlers' leadership acted falsely as if a real church following the orders.

Thus, although the orders were issued in good intention, there was no a responsible party " truthful church" to implement the orders in support of the church's interests except the victims.

Chairman Kim’s excuse, to recover the abused fund could be costly and he did not act. The church has a liability insurance.

The writer wishes let your office would understand that your office fell into the situation in messy deceptive scenario that should be carefully analyzed and cleared the matters to do justice for the church accordingly in honor of your office in light of our civility.

Rev. Chul Woo Chang and so-called church officers
failed to define the proper role of the church, the embezzlers and the victims in moral context. Most of all, none of them morally qualified to carry out the duties.

When Rev. Chul Woo Chang assigned to the church. We expected that he would carry out to clean up the corruption and to recover the abused funds according to your order, the church rule and Christian principles.

Although he pretended to do so at his initial stage of ministry, he did not have enough moral capacity to carry out your order and fell into the offenders' ploys and also he used the occasion for his own political gains by joining the trouble makers, creating one body against justice in favor of the offender Rev. Won Tae Cha and his group. Rev. Chang said in public “Rev. Won Tae Cha is my mentor”.

Meantime openly demonize our family in his wise venture which seems to be out of our common sense as a pastor.

Pastor's Alliance with Abusers
Their Bullying

Now he consolidated the church and the embezzlers into one party against our family as scapegoat again. It is absolutely the pastor's sinful unwise intentional decision contrary to the fact, the courts' and your opinions - most of all in the common clergy moral sense.

Rev. Chul Woo Chang is ministering in the corrupt old church ideas infested with deadly viruses. Consequently his corruption failed to play his real church role to demand the offenders to restitute the abused fund as your office initially ordered the Church to do so.

At this stage the Attorney General's office should clarify the role conflicts realistically and clearly establish the legally proper functions of each party. (The main reason of the conflict is the fact that the church is still under the control of the offenders).

Rescue the fate of the pastor Chul Woo Chang in the moral pitfall, as he has become the de facto leader of the criminal gang. Please sternly advise them for an enlightenment not to stay in the dark room any longer.
The doctrine, the separation of the church and the state should not shield them at all in this mess.

The complex money scandals consequently are shamefully still brewing among the mixed up clergies and his flock in solidarity, scapegoating and demonizing our family as if we are the problems in order to justify their criminal actions for money laundry in the name of the church. The church needs the protection of anti bully law if any. The victims are constantly under their threats.

Abusers Deceived Attorney General

All the offenders - Rev. Chul Woo Chang, the church officers and the brainwashed` members, pretended as if representing the church to your investigation and no positive results but deception came to you from them.

Associate pastor Mark Kim seems to have failed
to define his position in the investigation proceedings seems to be disconnected from the tradition.

Your office over trusted them or seems to have enforced the law in confusion under the influence of their politically powerful attorney Morton Povman as if he was representing the church, but the offenders against "the real church's interest.”

Attorney General's office should understand the situation that their politicking deceived it. Thus, the orders seem to have been applied for the case without a positive result in contrary to the original intention.

The status of the victimized family as scapegoats was invisible to the Attorney General's office although they were the most visible suffering parties during the process of the wise and cruel money laundry schemers, leaving the church in cold.

Following the false information from their attorney your office seemed to have failed implementing your order and enforcing the State law upon them.

Omitting the roles of the victims further weakened your power to exercise the authority effectively over them. Consequently they were benefited from the money laundry as if the victors against our civility.

Please let me further explain the picture how your orders failed to be effectively applied in the disorderly process to mislead your office as follows:


Rev. Chang Blocks Audit
When Ms. Kwang Hee Kim became the chairwoman of the Board, she initiated to recover some of the negligently abandoned trust fund by the smart 9 trustee members. During her term, Ms. Kim had contacted Attorney General's office as he requested, although she initially was not responsive to provide her private address. The abandonment should be investigated if criminally oriented. The entire stolen amount was never known to date.

Initially she was a member of the abusers group.
She was one of the two groups who visited our residence years ago and urged us to settle the $8,000,000 extortion lawsuits by them. She said, she talked with Steven H. Park until 4 A.M., that day mooring.
She was among the brainwashed dummies. However, her role to recover the missing fund was the first lively sign for a positive recovery of the abused fund. It was her brave mind as an amazing renewal sign during the 20 years’ history of this church corruption.
But her recovery efforts seemed to have been appeared as a deadly sting to some in the church group.

Replaced Chairperson
Meantime there was a move to replace the chairwoman Ms. Kim. Mr. Hyun Joong Kim ran for the election of the position.
There were occasions; Mr. Kim nearly two hours talked with Mrs. Sone (Kyung Kim, M.D.), who was a church officers and leader of the group. Mr. Kim asked her that the women's group help Dr. Kid Ok Cho get elected as a trustee who is well qualified, according to their plan.
Rev. Cha made the church meetings to be held at the evenings when many could not come because of the nighttime security concerns. It was his tactic to have his own loyal members come to help him. For only special occasion, women would attend at the evening meetings.

The election night was a special occasion for them because Dr. Cho was to run for an office as her group wished.

Election Gimmick
When the particular meeting was in the evening, they learned that Mr. Kim was candidate himself for a trustee.
But he never informed others that Dr. Cho was going to run for a trustee from the women's group. He seemed to have deceived Mrs. Sone and her group as his men's group falsely promised campaign for Dr. Cho.
But it appeared that Mr. Kim solicited the women’s group for his own interest.
Consequently Mr. Kim did get elected by getting all the extra women' votes.
Dr. Cho naturally did not get enough votes from women alone. The tricks were revealed after the election.
Consequently Mr. Kim replaced Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's chairmanship. Thus Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's recovery efforts of the stolen church money terminated.

The Defendants (Victims) not
Represented for the Investigation
We the victims should have been represented the church for the investigation as they had only reliable resources of information on the motivation of the offenders and to verify the items of evil issues. We had no direct interchange of the data among the related parties in the investigation. The victims did not have chance to verify the data your office had from them for the investigation.
Obviously the conclusion based upon the one sided superficial information.

No Trustees for Church
I understand that Mr. Hyun Joong Kim as the chairman represented the church at your investigation. Technically he did so.
Thus, his information to you was not without prejudice.
Practically he was on the abusers' side as it was further revealed his pro-abuser standing against our family in other occasions as in money laundry.
Consequently it was questionable if his presentation to you was reliable.

Refused Recovery Order
By the end of the investigation, the assistant Attorney General informed me that he advised the new chairman to restore the abused fund.
When I questioned Mr. Kim about the advice, he said he would not do it, as it would cost for the church to restitute the stolen money. Why the cost was his concern when the abusers should pay back the stolen church money to the beloved church?
The Judge Hoahng at the sanctions hearings strongly suggested to recover the money and the church could sue them for damages as Her honor learned all the tactics and perjuries in their attorney's testimony. The court repeatedly warned that they could not sue us. Definitely the church was not a party and we were their victims.
They were not entitled to the church money for their legal costs either.
Also honorable F. Dana Winslow often mentioned the embezzlement would be taken care of fairly by the Attorney General.
Thus, the courts clearly defined 1. The church was not a party. 2. Plaintiffs usurped the name of the church as plaintiffs. 3. They used unauthorized church money for their conspiracy. 4. They did not have any cause to sue us.

Demand Audit from 2000
On July 15, 2007, the church passed Ms. Kwang Hee Kim’s proposal to audit the financial records from 2000 by CPA (not Korean CPA) as she felt her recovery efforts of the missing fund incomplete.
Reverend Chang at the time stated, “I will do it with two other people.” Since then, he is stalling the audit in un-Christian way to cover up his mentor, his colleague's and others' embezzlements.

Fake Demand for Restitution
On December 14, 2008, Mr. Hyun Joong Kim and Mr. Kwang Taeg Rim made a strange proposal to recover the abused trust fund from the abusers.
Mr. & Mrs. Rim was among the deponents who falsely filed affidavits in support of their litigation against us, leading to the murder charges against my son and me that demanded $8 million damages from us.
Now as he is affiliated with Columbia University, he ought to reflect such institutional ethics at least to the church affairs.
It was absolutely questionable on their sincerity as they made unnecessary proposal while they refused to follow the Attorney Generals initial orders to recover the abused fund from them. It appears just as another ploy to cover-up the money laundry to embarrass the victims, to kill time and to deceive the congregation.
After that proposal, during a Sunday lunch period, once I asked him, "How is going on the recovery?"
He was unexpectedly offended by the questioning and reacted shouting at me in public, among other unlikely church words, accused me "as if I was acting as a pressuring landlord to collect rent money." His violent reaction was totally out of the Christian context - it was about the stolen trust fund but a rent. My questioning seemed to have stung his unsettled conscience in adverse to the Attorney General's order.

He said Attorney General not to Audit
34/10/2010The following at the lunch period, In-Taek Rhim, church finance officer remarked, as the abuse was an old mistake and an old issue. Pyung Kyum Kim stated. "You are too old and bringing up the old issues unnecessarily..." These church officers were trying to berry the serious issues as the old mistakes. Their words seem to reflect the intentional cover up of the crimes.
Thus, his December 14th proposal appeared nothing but another cover up trick for them.

Prayer by Money Laundry man
On the Sunday March 14, 2010, Mr. Deuk Joo Chun offered the Sunday prayer on the pulpit who was one of the radical parties to promote the church financed lawsuits against our family. He was a false witness that I assaulted and injured Steven H. Park on the church stairways according to the Park's court testimony for the case of the mass murder charges.
What a scandalous prayer is his?
These are reflections of Rev. Chul Woo Chang's morality allowing such character in "Jesus disguise” pray on the pulpit out of our Christian principles.
Prior to his prayer, he should have confessed his sins and their sins first and return the stolen church money. The transcript of his court testimony will cost $1,300 that would reveal their dept of abuse activities.
His prayer seems to signal another danger to us as the demonstration of their consolidated brutal church gang power without the proper confession in good faith.

Money Laundry Letters
The letter by Young Soo Shin, Young Joo Kwon to Sei Chun that submitted to your investigation, justified the $100,000 loan from the trust fund that was contrary to Steven H. Park's court testimony that the money largely given to Rev. Won Tae Cha - illegal transfer. They were all involved in the money laundry that had no their moral equivalency to the letter or letters.
The recent financial report stated the officers brought back debt records once the pastor removed it.
Sei Chun and others managed $180,000 building renovation project that lost for nothing in 6 months. Kwon Yong Ok was the Building Committee Chair who was an employee of the contractors.
Now the building fund is outside of the Trustees control according to information. It seems to be secretively managed. The Church Building project remains to be seen how it goes as their quality of the people are no better than for the failed case.
Columbia trained, MIT trained, CPA, fake CPA, fake M.D. lawyer and other good-trained smart guys operating the laundry mill, which now Rev. Chul Woo Chang condones. All of their letters on the subject matter in the AG’s investion should be considered laundry letters.

Audit Mockery
Mr. Soon Hi So, so called an in-house auditor of the church, but Rev. Chul Woo Chang is not cooperative for his work fairly according to information. He is not given all the necessary data of the financial transactions that he needed for it several years. According to him there are many missing accounts.

Ineffective State Law
Considering their unconventional function of minds, It was not known what kind papers were submitted to your office in support of their transactions by the abusers. None of their papers could have moved the law for losers' (church) favor according to the factual results as a critical failure sign of the authorities, according our review.
No Recovery of Embezzlement
Paul Choi's embezzlement seemed to have been sanctified in time as a justifiable spending as it is silent about his repayments to the church.
Your office seemed to have failed to properly verify the investigative data with the victims. Eventually your investigation seemed to have ended one sided in favor of the embezzlers and their supporters, as there were not real Church representative or representatives in good faith to seek the recovery.

Murder Charges To Cover up Abuses
Initially Rev. Won Tae Cha created the trouble. In order to protect the trust fund, I, as the chairman tried to prevent the abuse of the trust fund. But our family became their scapegoat for all their applications of the laundry psychology.
My wife, my son and I met unusual cruel extortion lawsuits by them for $8 million. Of course, the tactics were to cover up their embezzlement of the trust fund in this dark immigrant community.
For one case, my son and I were accused as the mass murderers and were on the trial at the NYS Supreme Court. All the wise guys came to the court in support of the false accusations while they wrote false saintly letters in response to your investigation, yet issuing the illicit checks to support the cases. It only could have occurred in the stupid money mad congregation in the state of New York.

Episcopacy lied to Judge
During the trial, the judge F. Dana Winslow mentioned that someone from the bishop's office stated at an ex parte conference that the murder charges were church related. We demanded the bishop and others to reveal who lied to the judge. Bishop Jeremiah J. Park, Super Noel N. Chin, Rev. Won Tae Cha or Chul Woo Chang and others are stone walling to the questions without telling the truth against His will. Where is Jesus in the clergy hearts?

Prejudicial Investigation
Without the victims’ verification of the investigative data of the abused church money, the conclusion seemed to have been done unfairly in the embezzlers' favor as it based upon the offenders' inaccurate pre-judicial information.
In other words, your investigation seems to suggest there was no equal protection for us under the state law; 1) that their abuse of the church money was justified, 2) that the victims' sufferings were ignored or justified and 3) that the church is not protected although she has lost the church money to the embezzlers. The defendants and the church are principal victims. But the criminals had free lunch.

Criminal Rights vs. Civil Rights
Under the circumstances, our civil rights were brutally violated as the state overlooked all the facts including the criminal elements injured us immensely. The end result seems to have favored the criminal rights, making the church loser.
If that is the role of the New York State Law for the church and the victims, it absolutely ineffective in protecting them, favoring the offenders.
All of the offenders, the clergies and the so-called church officers in the same group demonized us to justify their extortion. As the result, the church bullies seem to have won the game with the stolen free money.

Powerful Attorney for Abusers
Their attorney Morton Povman, Esq. revealed in his testimony at the bench that he retained by Young So Kim and Steven H. Park, not by the church. Thus, the plaintiffs and the attorney usurped the church’s name for the lawsuits against us -there was absolutely no representation of the church in the cases. Just they succeeded in cheating the court system. For they were fake plaintiffs in the cases, committing perjuries.
Church Rules Prohibit Lawsuit
For the church rules clearly do not allow personal lawsuits among the members for church's interests.
The justice Hoahng clearly stated on that effect.
Some of the leading profiles; further more, Steven H. Park stated in the court testimony that he had MBA degree from Columbia. Young So Kim made a false statement, as he is a licensed physician in the NY State – false MBA and M.D. degrees.
Once I filed complaint against his false affidavit to the president of the City University. The former pastor Sung Soo Hahn learned Kim's trouble with the president and called me why I made such complaint to the president. He might loose his college job. I told the pastor who was for the troublemakers. I advised him, "why do the church interfere in the problems belong to the state and Young So Kim?" I told him, "I would not honor your sacraments now on as it presided over by such a clergy."
As he had a good political attorney, his position seems to have been secured at the University regardless the perjury.

Free Church Money for Powerful
As the cases suggest, it is OK for any fake church member to steal the church money if one has well coordinating money laundrymen with efficient attorneys. No false affidavits ever punished as in the cases, which is a corrupt danger signal to the lax legal system.

New Law for Protection
of Church and Innocent Victims
We must have a better law for the innocent victims and the church, which should not be left out without legal protection as in this case in the state of New York.
Under this present law, any group could steal any church money tactically with immunity. We believe that there should be a new legislation to protect the church and the innocent victims like us, punishing adequately those whom violate the law.
The new movements such as Tea Party, Coffee Party or New York People’s Convention are lively reflections to combat the dysfunctional system of our government

Toothless Law Empowered Offenders
As they learned the smart tactics and the soft law, the litigants are come back to the church power under the questionable leadership of Rev. Chul Woo Chang who abused the information on the scandals given by Mrs. Sone prior to his appointment.
In fact, after the frivolous lawsuits were sanctioned or ended, the New York State Attorney General and the Judge advised the church to recover the stolen money from the abusers.
But, following the end of the court cases, the stability only short-lived as Rev. Chul Woo Chang has followed his colleague Rev. Won Tae Cha who engineered all the tricks against His will for personal greeds.

Election Campaign for Bishop
Many others believe that Rev. Chul Woo Chang and Rev. Won Tae Cha campaigned for Rev. Jeremiah J. Park's election for bishop.
Although they are his political patrons, he, as the bishop, is now obliged to follow the church rules, the state, federal laws, and obey God to clean up the embezzlement of the church money and other anti-Christian attacks against innocent church members. However, he apparently failed to act promptly as a bishop, acting as in his or her own faction.
The New York City Office of the Bishop located at a walking distance to this church with chronic ills.

Disqualified Clergies
The criminal events in violation of the church creeds suggest the prohibition of their standing on the pulpits as they are in the same scandals against His will. Or they would stay on, as they know the state law works in favor of the persons even if involved in the crime to disgrace His honor. Somebody should stop the sinking Christianity under the leadership of irreligious clergies. We believe the Attorney General could stop the church bullies to rescue the sinking historic Korean church within his jurisdiction.

Re-investigation
You once advised to resubmit the request for further investigation. But the resubmission did not follow through by the office. It was a serious missing link.
Since your orders were not implemented at all to date, Please let me demand you again the reinvestigation for the recovery all of the stolen money, in honor of your office, the church, our family and social justice.
The information in your hand and present letter would provide an additional guidance for your reinvestigation for the good cause.

IN SUMMARY
Reorder to Restitute
Define responsible parties - Church, Abusers, and Victims - to implement the new orders.
Demand the church open the audit of the
Financial data from 2000, as she decided it on July 15, 2007, according to Ms. Kwang Hee Kim's proposal. Rev. Chul Woo Chang is preventing it disgracefully against his own clergy oath.
Please let me know if anyone from your
office advised Mr. in Tack Rhim, "Do not audit," as he once told me so. Mr. Rhim is CPA in his profession. As a church officer has been involved in the most of the illicit check writings in support of the frivolous extortion lawsuits. His violations could be in your jurisdiction. He is responsible party too in all the abuses.
Please order the clergy Chul Woo Chang
and the church to separate the church’s role from the offenders and demand the offenders to restitute the abused money and Save the church according to His wills under your guidance- they violated the church rules and state law.
Thus they are not entitled to any legal
protection at all in the embezzlements.
Unless a common wisdom prevails faithfully for the church, every body is going to be “a fool” as I speak as a fool, except the wise saintly abusers.
Sincerely,
Chae S. Sone
2 Woodbury Court Hicksville, NY 11801
Reference
1. “Methodist politics corruption.” New York Times. April 10, 1982.
Three Ways To truly Rethink Church in NYC " The New Methodists Posted by: chae s. Sone at August 26, 2008 .
Christianity daily. GUILINES FOR DISCIPLESHIP TRAINING INTRDUCTION I took a liberty to name this
4. A petition to Bishop Jeremiah J. Park to recover misused Church
5. Christ Our Life Ministries International - Guestbook
The Christ Our Life Ministries International is a full gospel Christian ministry based in ... Dear Jesus! I am the Korean Bishop Jeremiah J. Park. What can I do for you in this...?